Origy

AFL Double Standard on Aggression

· news

The AFL’s Double Standard on Aggression

The Australian Football League (AFL) has announced plans to introduce a new video review system, dubbed “vision-based score assist,” in 2026. This technology will provide match officials with additional vision to support decision-making and strengthen the accuracy and consistency of the score review process.

However, the AFLW’s “vision-based” system is a watered-down version of its counterpart in the men’s league, the ARC. Unlike the ARC, which has access to comprehensive and high-tech cameras, the AFLW’s system will use available broadcast and fixed cameras.

The introduction of ball-tracking technology in 2024 was hailed as an exciting step forward for AFLW, but it had its share of issues. The tech incorrectly registered a touch off the boot of Sun Jamie Stanton in a Gold Coast v Collingwood clash, raising questions about its reliability. This latest development has led to concerns that the AFL is perpetuating a double standard.

The league’s emphasis on player safety and fair play appears inconsistent when it comes to the men’s game. The ARC has been plagued by controversy throughout its implementation, with many incidents of overruling goal umpires sparking debate about the need for such technology. A recent rule change restricts the ARC from overruling a goal umpire unless the umpire has called for a review.

Collingwood coach Craig McRae has vowed his team will continue to walk a fine line between aggression and consequence. The Magpies have been fined over $30,000 this season for their behavior on the field, with several players facing individual fines for incidents of misconduct. However, McRae’s commitment to encouraging his players to “stand up for something” raises questions about the league’s stance on player conduct.

While the women’s game has made significant strides in recent years, the introduction of this new technology is just one part of a larger conversation about fairness and accountability in the AFL. As the league continues to evolve its officiating technology, it must also prioritize consistency and transparency across all competitions.

The upcoming NAB AFLW Season will be a crucial test for the new system. However, more work needs to be done to address the double standard that has plagued the league for far too long. The AFL must demonstrate its commitment to fairness and player safety by implementing policies that apply equally to both men’s and women’s competitions.

The AFL could take a page from the rugby world, where concussion protocols have been a top priority in recent years. The league has made significant strides in reducing head injuries and promoting player welfare, but more can be done to ensure these efforts are replicated across all sports.

As the season unfolds, it will be essential for fans, players, and officials alike to hold the AFL accountable for its actions. Only by prioritizing fairness and transparency can the league truly live up to its promise of promoting a safe and exciting game for all.

Reader Views

  • EK
    Editor K. Wells · editor

    The AFL's obsession with technology is laudable, but its selective application raises eyebrows. The men's game gets the high-tech treatment, while the women's league makes do with broadcast cameras. This double standard perpetuates a culture of inconsistency, where player safety and fair play are applied according to league rather than principle. We need more emphasis on implementing rules that apply equally across both competitions, not just tinkering with technology that's still finding its feet. The AFL's vision-based score assist may be a step forward, but it's time to tackle the real issue: creating a level playing field for all.

  • RJ
    Reporter J. Avery · staff reporter

    "The AFL's vision-based systems are touted as a step forward in accuracy and consistency, but the disparity between men's and women's leagues is a glaring omission. The focus on player safety is admirable, but it rings hollow when applied selectively. A more pressing concern is how these systems will be integrated into existing game protocols, and whether they'll exacerbate existing issues of aggression and misconduct. With the ARC's history of controversy and recent rule changes, it's clear that this technology is a Band-Aid solution rather than a comprehensive answer to the league's problems."

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    The AFL's "vision-based score assist" rollout highlights a concerning trend: disparate treatment of its two main competitions. While the men's ARC gets cutting-edge tech and expansive camera coverage, the women's league settles for a watered-down version. This inconsistency raises questions about the league's priorities on player safety and fair play. One can't help but wonder if the AFL is more invested in showcasing high-tech gadgetry than genuinely promoting the growth of women's football.

Related articles

More from Origy

View as Web Story →